<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1280 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799254</link>
    <description>Section 138 requires a cheque to be presented within its validity period. Following the merger of Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank, legacy Syndicate Bank cheques remained valid for presentation only until 30 June 2021, after which the former banking codes were permanently disabled. Presentation of such a cheque in 2025 therefore involved an invalid instrument. Dishonour of an invalid cheque does not trigger criminal liability under Section 138, and prosecution based on it would constitute an abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1280 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799254</link>
      <description>Section 138 requires a cheque to be presented within its validity period. Following the merger of Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank, legacy Syndicate Bank cheques remained valid for presentation only until 30 June 2021, after which the former banking codes were permanently disabled. Presentation of such a cheque in 2025 therefore involved an invalid instrument. Dishonour of an invalid cheque does not trigger criminal liability under Section 138, and prosecution based on it would constitute an abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>