<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1281 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799255</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction over an assessment that accepted Form-F declarations under section 6A(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act was unavailable where the same issue had been determined for subsequent assessment years and those determinations were accepted without challenge. Finality of the subsequent-year adjudication required consistent treatment of the relevant assessment year, rendering revision of the accepted declarations unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1281 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799255</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction over an assessment that accepted Form-F declarations under section 6A(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act was unavailable where the same issue had been determined for subsequent assessment years and those determinations were accepted without challenge. Finality of the subsequent-year adjudication required consistent treatment of the relevant assessment year, rendering revision of the accepted declarations unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>