<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1289 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799263</link>
    <description>Effective delivery of a demand notice to the corporate debtor&#039;s registered office by private courier, supported by tracking details, constitutes substantial compliance with the notice requirement. For foreign-currency claims, conversion at the exchange rate prevailing on the demand-notice date may establish that admitted unpaid advances exceed the statutory threshold. Damages correspondence relating to a separate consignment does not create a genuine pre-existing dispute over admitted advances where the debtor acknowledged receipt, undertook repayment, and neither supplied goods nor refunded the money. Claimed solvency does not itself defeat a Section 9 application where operational debt, default, valid notice, and absence of a genuine dispute are established. Full payment before admission can prevent commencement of the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1289 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799263</link>
      <description>Effective delivery of a demand notice to the corporate debtor&#039;s registered office by private courier, supported by tracking details, constitutes substantial compliance with the notice requirement. For foreign-currency claims, conversion at the exchange rate prevailing on the demand-notice date may establish that admitted unpaid advances exceed the statutory threshold. Damages correspondence relating to a separate consignment does not create a genuine pre-existing dispute over admitted advances where the debtor acknowledged receipt, undertook repayment, and neither supplied goods nor refunded the money. Claimed solvency does not itself defeat a Section 9 application where operational debt, default, valid notice, and absence of a genuine dispute are established. Full payment before admission can prevent commencement of the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>