https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799266 Exclusion of a substantial shareholder from management and established economic participation in a quasi-partnership company may constitute oppression where it occurs without due process or justification. Vacation of a director's office for non-attendance requires proof that board-meeting notices were served; continued recognition as a director and the absence of evidence of data misuse or employee solicitation may negate allegations of wrongful competing conduct. Where pre-emption rights have substantially been invoked but a buyout remains incomplete, and shareholder groups seek mutual exit amid irreconcilable differences, a supervised inter se Swiss Challenge process may provide a fair and transparent share-purchase remedy under Section 242. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799266 Exclusion of a substantial shareholder from management and established economic participation in a quasi-partnership company may constitute oppression where it occurs without due process or justification. Vacation of a director's office for non-attendance requires proof that board-meeting notices were served; continued recognition as a director and the absence of evidence of data misuse or employee solicitation may negate allegations of wrongful competing conduct. Where pre-emption rights have substantially been invoked but a buyout remains incomplete, and shareholder groups seek mutual exit amid irreconcilable differences, a supervised inter se Swiss Challenge process may provide a fair and transparent share-purchase remedy under Section 242. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799266