<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1344 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799318</link>
    <description>Recall of the writ proceeding was allowed. The revived petition was then closed, but the closure did not prevent institution of fresh proceedings on the same cause of action. Fresh proceedings may be instituted on that cause of action and may include a challenge to Section 147A. Existing protection was continued for 90 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1344 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799318</link>
      <description>Recall of the writ proceeding was allowed. The revived petition was then closed, but the closure did not prevent institution of fresh proceedings on the same cause of action. Fresh proceedings may be instituted on that cause of action and may include a challenge to Section 147A. Existing protection was continued for 90 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>