<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Information suggesting income escapement cannot support reassessment where it merely seeks verification through a roving inquiry.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103957</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 148A requires information that rationally and directly suggests income escapement; mere suspicion, a need for further scrutiny, or a verification objective is insufficient. The material and the taxpayer&#039;s response must be considered in a speaking order before a case is treated as fit for reassessment. Treating an entire trust&#039;s expenditure over several years as unexplained, despite accounts, bank records and vouchers, without identifying a false explanation or unaccounted amount, constitutes an impermissible roving or fishing inquiry. The reassessment order and consequential notice for the relevant assessment year were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Information suggesting income escapement cannot support reassessment where it merely seeks verification through a roving inquiry.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103957</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 148A requires information that rationally and directly suggests income escapement; mere suspicion, a need for further scrutiny, or a verification objective is insufficient. The material and the taxpayer&#039;s response must be considered in a speaking order before a case is treated as fit for reassessment. Treating an entire trust&#039;s expenditure over several years as unexplained, despite accounts, bank records and vouchers, without identifying a false explanation or unaccounted amount, constitutes an impermissible roving or fishing inquiry. The reassessment order and consequential notice for the relevant assessment year were set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>