<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PMLA proceedings and resolution applicant eligibility: pending attachments do not bar plan approval without the prescribed conviction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103940</link>
    <description>Pending PMLA attachment proceedings do not by themselves disqualify a prospective resolution applicant; disqualification requires the conviction specified under section 29A. Disclosure requirements under Regulation 39(1)(c) operate harmoniously with section 29A, particularly where the CoC knew of, assessed, and deliberated on the proceedings before plan approval. Review of the CoC&#039;s commercial assessment of plan feasibility, viability, and implementation remains confined to statutory approval and appeal grounds. A plan may conditionally protect a disputed creditor&#039;s position by automatically revising distribution if secured-financial-creditor status is later established. On these grounds, the challenge to plan approval failed, with no statutory infirmity found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PMLA proceedings and resolution applicant eligibility: pending attachments do not bar plan approval without the prescribed conviction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103940</link>
      <description>Pending PMLA attachment proceedings do not by themselves disqualify a prospective resolution applicant; disqualification requires the conviction specified under section 29A. Disclosure requirements under Regulation 39(1)(c) operate harmoniously with section 29A, particularly where the CoC knew of, assessed, and deliberated on the proceedings before plan approval. Review of the CoC&#039;s commercial assessment of plan feasibility, viability, and implementation remains confined to statutory approval and appeal grounds. A plan may conditionally protect a disputed creditor&#039;s position by automatically revising distribution if secured-financial-creditor status is later established. On these grounds, the challenge to plan approval failed, with no statutory infirmity found.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>