<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Post-merger cheque validity bars dishonour prosecution when presentation occurs after the prescribed bank-merger replacement deadline.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103936</link>
    <description>Post-merger validity of cheques is a mandatory precondition to prosecution for cheque dishonour under Section 138. Merger terms made cheques drawn on Syndicate Bank invalid after 30 June 2021. A cheque presented nearly four years after that deadline was therefore not a valid instrument, even if dishonoured. Because presentation within the instrument&#039;s validity period is essential to Section 138 liability, proceedings founded on the invalid cheque were quashed. The complainant retained liberty to pursue other remedies available in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Post-merger cheque validity bars dishonour prosecution when presentation occurs after the prescribed bank-merger replacement deadline.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103936</link>
      <description>Post-merger validity of cheques is a mandatory precondition to prosecution for cheque dishonour under Section 138. Merger terms made cheques drawn on Syndicate Bank invalid after 30 June 2021. A cheque presented nearly four years after that deadline was therefore not a valid instrument, even if dishonoured. Because presentation within the instrument&#039;s validity period is essential to Section 138 liability, proceedings founded on the invalid cheque were quashed. The complainant retained liberty to pursue other remedies available in law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:20:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>