<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 291 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53933</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld duty demands on the actual length of cables laid under sea and on imported cables used for repairs/replacement. The penalty imposed under Section 114A was set aside, considering the non-retrospective nature of the penal clause and granting benefits to M/s. VSNL as a Public Sector Undertaking. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:18:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 291 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53933</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld duty demands on the actual length of cables laid under sea and on imported cables used for repairs/replacement. The penalty imposed under Section 114A was set aside, considering the non-retrospective nature of the penal clause and granting benefits to M/s. VSNL as a Public Sector Undertaking. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>