<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 286 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Portable Pilot Plant, capable of being dismantled and relocated, was movable property and not subject to excise duty. Referring to legal principles and precedents, including the Triveni Engg. &amp;amp; Industries Ltd. v. CCE case, the Tribunal emphasized the plant&#039;s mobility as evidenced by its relocation to another site. It was concluded that since the plant could be removed after dismantling, it met the criteria of being movable and therefore not liable to excise duty. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 286 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Portable Pilot Plant, capable of being dismantled and relocated, was movable property and not subject to excise duty. Referring to legal principles and precedents, including the Triveni Engg. &amp;amp; Industries Ltd. v. CCE case, the Tribunal emphasized the plant&#039;s mobility as evidenced by its relocation to another site. It was concluded that since the plant could be removed after dismantling, it met the criteria of being movable and therefore not liable to excise duty. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>