<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 208 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the remission claim following a fire breakage in a factory unjustifiable, as the late filing reason was deemed extraneous to statutory provisions. The Tribunal set aside the order, waived the pre-deposit requirement, and allowed the appeal at the stay stage, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and consistency in evaluating remission claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:46:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 208 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the remission claim following a fire breakage in a factory unjustifiable, as the late filing reason was deemed extraneous to statutory provisions. The Tribunal set aside the order, waived the pre-deposit requirement, and allowed the appeal at the stay stage, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and consistency in evaluating remission claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>