<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 203 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53914</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared on behalf of the appellants. The application seeking restoration of the appeal was filed after a delay of about eight years, with no sufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal dismissed the application, stating that the valuable right acquired by the Revenue cannot be taken away after such a long delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 203 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53914</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared on behalf of the appellants. The application seeking restoration of the appeal was filed after a delay of about eight years, with no sufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal dismissed the application, stating that the valuable right acquired by the Revenue cannot be taken away after such a long delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>