<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Provident-fund dues outside insolvency waterfall require payment with interest, while damages discretion awaits larger-Bench review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103891</link>
    <description>Provident-fund and gratuity dues are excluded from the liquidation estate and cannot be distributed through the insolvency waterfall; a successful resolution applicant must discharge those dues, including statutory interest on arrears. Statutory interest compensates delayed contributions, whereas damages for delay are penal in nature. The expression &quot;may recover&quot; in Section 14B raises whether the authorised officer may decline to impose damages in extenuating circumstances, despite no requirement of mens rea or actus reus; that issue stands referred to a larger Bench. A successful resolution applicant may seek Central Board reduction or waiver of damages, treating resolution-plan implementation as comparable to rehabilitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:31:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Provident-fund dues outside insolvency waterfall require payment with interest, while damages discretion awaits larger-Bench review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103891</link>
      <description>Provident-fund and gratuity dues are excluded from the liquidation estate and cannot be distributed through the insolvency waterfall; a successful resolution applicant must discharge those dues, including statutory interest on arrears. Statutory interest compensates delayed contributions, whereas damages for delay are penal in nature. The expression &quot;may recover&quot; in Section 14B raises whether the authorised officer may decline to impose damages in extenuating circumstances, despite no requirement of mens rea or actus reus; that issue stands referred to a larger Bench. A successful resolution applicant may seek Central Board reduction or waiver of damages, treating resolution-plan implementation as comparable to rehabilitation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:31:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>