<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 232 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they and M/s. Murkumbi Bio-Agro Pvt. Ltd were not related persons. Consequently, the advertisement and promotional expenses incurred by MBAPL were not to be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal found no connection between the expenses and the transaction value of the appellant, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 232 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they and M/s. Murkumbi Bio-Agro Pvt. Ltd were not related persons. Consequently, the advertisement and promotional expenses incurred by MBAPL were not to be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal found no connection between the expenses and the transaction value of the appellant, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>