<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 229 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53905</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s request for review of a Tribunal decision was dismissed. The Tribunal had overturned an order confiscating goods and referred the matter back for review, stating the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction. The reviewing court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the Tribunal exceeded its authority in designating the competent authority for future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:52:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 229 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53905</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s request for review of a Tribunal decision was dismissed. The Tribunal had overturned an order confiscating goods and referred the matter back for review, stating the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction. The reviewing court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the Tribunal exceeded its authority in designating the competent authority for future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>