<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1131 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799105</link>
    <description>Retrospective renewal of an expired Way Leave Permission cannot revive rights that lapsed before corporate insolvency resolution proceedings or impair intervening authorised works. Fresh permission remains within the Railway authorities&#039; competence and requires compliance with applicable engineering standards. A comprehensive safety audit and an opportunity of hearing are necessary where a proposed structure may affect existing underpasses, adjoining property or public safety. Persons facing potential adverse civil consequences have standing to challenge such administrative permission. Fraud or collusion requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; invalidity of the permission alone does not establish either allegation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 07:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1131 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799105</link>
      <description>Retrospective renewal of an expired Way Leave Permission cannot revive rights that lapsed before corporate insolvency resolution proceedings or impair intervening authorised works. Fresh permission remains within the Railway authorities&#039; competence and requires compliance with applicable engineering standards. A comprehensive safety audit and an opportunity of hearing are necessary where a proposed structure may affect existing underpasses, adjoining property or public safety. Persons facing potential adverse civil consequences have standing to challenge such administrative permission. Fraud or collusion requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; invalidity of the permission alone does not establish either allegation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>