https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799113 Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal ordinarily calls for restraint under Article 226 but is not an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction. A challenge to treating goods as prohibited solely by description and asserted criminal-law application, without an identified statutory or notification-based prohibition, raised an arguable departure from objective legal standards affecting the right to trade. The preliminary alternative-remedy objection was rejected, the writ petition was maintainable, and the merits remained for hearing. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2026 07:52:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799113 Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal ordinarily calls for restraint under Article 226 but is not an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction. A challenge to treating goods as prohibited solely by description and asserted criminal-law application, without an identified statutory or notification-based prohibition, raised an arguable departure from objective legal standards affecting the right to trade. The preliminary alternative-remedy objection was rejected, the writ petition was maintainable, and the merits remained for hearing. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799113