<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1179 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799153</link>
    <description>Reasoned Tribunal adjudication requires meaningful consideration of the parties&#039; contentions and the issues arising from assessments. A common order disposing of seven appeals was procedurally irregular because it also covered separate sets of appeals heard and pronounced on different dates. The absence of reasons and apparent undue haste rendered the order unsustainable, requiring fresh and independent adjudication by a different Bench, with all merits remaining open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 07:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1179 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799153</link>
      <description>Reasoned Tribunal adjudication requires meaningful consideration of the parties&#039; contentions and the issues arising from assessments. A common order disposing of seven appeals was procedurally irregular because it also covered separate sets of appeals heard and pronounced on different dates. The absence of reasons and apparent undue haste rendered the order unsustainable, requiring fresh and independent adjudication by a different Bench, with all merits remaining open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>