<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1195 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799169</link>
    <description>Interim protection against GST demand orders may continue where the adjudicating authority has prima facie been unable to analyse and reconcile extensive delivery-channel data, e-way bills, invoices and accounting records. Where the record contains substantial transactional material and no further reconciliation material has been sought from the taxpayer, the complexity of the documentation supports continued protection while challenges to the demand orders are considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 07:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1195 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799169</link>
      <description>Interim protection against GST demand orders may continue where the adjudicating authority has prima facie been unable to analyse and reconcile extensive delivery-channel data, e-way bills, invoices and accounting records. Where the record contains substantial transactional material and no further reconciliation material has been sought from the taxpayer, the complexity of the documentation supports continued protection while challenges to the demand orders are considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>