<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 222 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition on the appellant for abetting the offense related to misdeclaration of prices for claiming drawback under the Customs Act. The penalty amount was reduced to Rs. 50,000 in each appeal for the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 222 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition on the appellant for abetting the offense related to misdeclaration of prices for claiming drawback under the Customs Act. The penalty amount was reduced to Rs. 50,000 in each appeal for the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>