<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 220 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confiscating goods as Lady/Lace Brass Scrap instead of Honey grade Brass Scrap under the Customs Act. The penalty imposed on the importer was deemed unjustified as the goods, though of a different grade, were suitable for re-melting. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of accurate classification and valuation of goods, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:09:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 220 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confiscating goods as Lady/Lace Brass Scrap instead of Honey grade Brass Scrap under the Customs Act. The penalty imposed on the importer was deemed unjustified as the goods, though of a different grade, were suitable for re-melting. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of accurate classification and valuation of goods, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>