<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2076 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471764</link>
    <description>Availability of a statutory appellate remedy despite delayed filing may be preserved where a substantial tax demand exists and the appellant asserts recent knowledge of the impugned order. An appeal filed within the permitted 30-day period must be entertained without rejection on limitation and decided on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 19:00:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2076 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471764</link>
      <description>Availability of a statutory appellate remedy despite delayed filing may be preserved where a substantial tax demand exists and the appellant asserts recent knowledge of the impugned order. An appeal filed within the permitted 30-day period must be entertained without rejection on limitation and decided on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>