<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2067 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471735</link>
    <description>Writ petitions seeking refund of amounts debited from bank accounts are not ordinarily entertained where a statutory appeal concerning the same cause of action is already pending. The appellate authority must adjudicate the grievance in accordance with law after hearing all concerned parties. Parallel writ proceedings should not bypass the statutory appellate remedy; the pending appeal should instead be decided expeditiously, preferably within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2067 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471735</link>
      <description>Writ petitions seeking refund of amounts debited from bank accounts are not ordinarily entertained where a statutory appeal concerning the same cause of action is already pending. The appellate authority must adjudicate the grievance in accordance with law after hearing all concerned parties. Parallel writ proceedings should not bypass the statutory appellate remedy; the pending appeal should instead be decided expeditiously, preferably within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>