<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 239 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53870</link>
    <description>A corrigendum cannot be used to impose additional duty liability by making substantive changes to an already issued order; its scope is limited to clerical or typographical corrections. Where significant alterations are required after the original order, the proper course is review rather than corrigendum. As the corrigendum was issued nearly two years later and materially changed the original order, the authority acted beyond its power. The corrigendum was therefore invalid and was rightly set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 239 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53870</link>
      <description>A corrigendum cannot be used to impose additional duty liability by making substantive changes to an already issued order; its scope is limited to clerical or typographical corrections. Where significant alterations are required after the original order, the proper course is review rather than corrigendum. As the corrigendum was issued nearly two years later and materially changed the original order, the authority acted beyond its power. The corrigendum was therefore invalid and was rightly set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>