<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 212 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the classification of imported consignments as waste and scrap of iron and steel instead of pipes for transmission of fluids or gas. The decision was based on evidence showing the consignments were melted for manufacturing goods for exports, supported by certificates of utilization and expert reports. The Tribunal emphasized the goods&#039; nature at importation and the subsequent melting process, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that actual use determined classification. The decision aligned with a previous case supporting importers, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 212 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the classification of imported consignments as waste and scrap of iron and steel instead of pipes for transmission of fluids or gas. The decision was based on evidence showing the consignments were melted for manufacturing goods for exports, supported by certificates of utilization and expert reports. The Tribunal emphasized the goods&#039; nature at importation and the subsequent melting process, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that actual use determined classification. The decision aligned with a previous case supporting importers, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>