<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1076 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799050</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the revisional authority considers enquiries into seized material inadequate after the Assessing Officer has conducted them and adopted a plausible view. Detailed notices, confrontation with seized documents and statements, and consideration of the assessee&#039;s explanations demonstrate that the assessment was not made without enquiry. Section 263 applies where lack of enquiry makes an assessment both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it does not permit substitution of the revisional authority&#039;s view for a considered assessment decision. The proposed revision was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1076 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799050</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the revisional authority considers enquiries into seized material inadequate after the Assessing Officer has conducted them and adopted a plausible view. Detailed notices, confrontation with seized documents and statements, and consideration of the assessee&#039;s explanations demonstrate that the assessment was not made without enquiry. Section 263 applies where lack of enquiry makes an assessment both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it does not permit substitution of the revisional authority&#039;s view for a considered assessment decision. The proposed revision was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>