<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1077 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799051</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated in the name of a deceased assessee does not comply with the statutory mechanism requiring assessment through the legal representative and is invalid. Sale proceeds from land deposited in a bank account may remain an asset for the extended reassessment period because the inclusive definition covers immovable property and bank deposits, where alleged escaped income crosses the prescribed threshold. However, a co-owner&#039;s valuation report alone cannot support reassessment: the Assessing Officer must independently examine the assessee&#039;s property, undertake appropriate valuation inquiry, consider tangible material, and form a belief that income escaped assessment. Proceedings founded solely on an unverified co-owner valuation are impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1077 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799051</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated in the name of a deceased assessee does not comply with the statutory mechanism requiring assessment through the legal representative and is invalid. Sale proceeds from land deposited in a bank account may remain an asset for the extended reassessment period because the inclusive definition covers immovable property and bank deposits, where alleged escaped income crosses the prescribed threshold. However, a co-owner&#039;s valuation report alone cannot support reassessment: the Assessing Officer must independently examine the assessee&#039;s property, undertake appropriate valuation inquiry, consider tangible material, and form a belief that income escaped assessment. Proceedings founded solely on an unverified co-owner valuation are impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>