<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Independent corroboration for retracted statements is required before imposing penalties for attempted export of prohibited goods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103830</link>
    <description>Independent corroboration was required to sustain a penalty for alleged involvement in an attempted export of prohibited red sanders where the allegation rested solely on statements later retracted. Retraction placed on record required consideration, and an uncorroborated retracted statement could not alone establish liability. The setting aside of penalty against the person alleged to have introduced the employee to the purported mastermind also removed the factual basis for penalising the employee. The penalty was therefore unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:38:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Independent corroboration for retracted statements is required before imposing penalties for attempted export of prohibited goods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103830</link>
      <description>Independent corroboration was required to sustain a penalty for alleged involvement in an attempted export of prohibited red sanders where the allegation rested solely on statements later retracted. Retraction placed on record required consideration, and an uncorroborated retracted statement could not alone establish liability. The setting aside of penalty against the person alleged to have introduced the employee to the purported mastermind also removed the factual basis for penalising the employee. The penalty was therefore unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:38:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>