<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2062 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471718</link>
    <description>Tax deduction at source under section 195 applied to a payment made to a non-resident because the payment, as confirmed in earlier appellate proceedings, was for non-technical value and did not fall within the specified category of payments not chargeable to tax. No contrary material displaced the findings supporting the payer&#039;s default. Consequently, tax was required to be deducted on the non-resident payment, and the finding of default against the assessee remained sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2062 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471718</link>
      <description>Tax deduction at source under section 195 applied to a payment made to a non-resident because the payment, as confirmed in earlier appellate proceedings, was for non-technical value and did not fall within the specified category of payments not chargeable to tax. No contrary material displaced the findings supporting the payer&#039;s default. Consequently, tax was required to be deducted on the non-resident payment, and the finding of default against the assessee remained sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>