<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 2024 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471726</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedy was available for challenges to a show-cause notice and consequential order, including objections concerning jurisdiction, mechanical adjudication and breach of natural justice. Those grounds were capable of examination through the prescribed appeal mechanism, without any opinion on their merits. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 2024 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471726</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedy was available for challenges to a show-cause notice and consequential order, including objections concerning jurisdiction, mechanical adjudication and breach of natural justice. Those grounds were capable of examination through the prescribed appeal mechanism, without any opinion on their merits. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>