<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 206 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53853</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeals as remand, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) due to delay in filing the appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-hearing and determination on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 206 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53853</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeals as remand, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) due to delay in filing the appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-hearing and determination on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>