<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 183 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53851</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI was allowed, setting aside the impugned order that dismissed the appeal for lack of predeposit under Section 129 E of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the appellants had a strong prima facie case and should not be required to make any predeposit. The appeal was remanded with directions for the Commissioner (Appeals) to review the appeal without insisting on predeposit, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying legal provisions and avoiding undue burden on parties during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 183 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53851</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI was allowed, setting aside the impugned order that dismissed the appeal for lack of predeposit under Section 129 E of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the appellants had a strong prima facie case and should not be required to make any predeposit. The appeal was remanded with directions for the Commissioner (Appeals) to review the appeal without insisting on predeposit, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying legal provisions and avoiding undue burden on parties during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>