<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 218 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53846</link>
    <description>The adjudicating authority determined that the floating crane, permanently mounted on a barge with vessel-like facilities, should be classified as a foreign-going vessel. Goods imported as &#039;ship stores&#039; for the crane were deemed duty-free, with no suppression of facts noted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing concerns of time-barred proceedings and suppression of facts, was dismissed by the Tribunal for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 218 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53846</link>
      <description>The adjudicating authority determined that the floating crane, permanently mounted on a barge with vessel-like facilities, should be classified as a foreign-going vessel. Goods imported as &#039;ship stores&#039; for the crane were deemed duty-free, with no suppression of facts noted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing concerns of time-barred proceedings and suppression of facts, was dismissed by the Tribunal for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>