<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 957 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798931</link>
    <description>Service-tax proceedings were time-barred because the show-cause notice was issued more than five years after the last relevant transaction reflected in Form 26AS. With the last transaction dated 30 September 2013 and notice issued on 12 October 2018, even the extended limitation period had expired. The demand was consequently unsustainable without examining its merits, and the limitation finding operated in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 957 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798931</link>
      <description>Service-tax proceedings were time-barred because the show-cause notice was issued more than five years after the last relevant transaction reflected in Form 26AS. With the last transaction dated 30 September 2013 and notice issued on 12 October 2018, even the extended limitation period had expired. The demand was consequently unsustainable without examining its merits, and the limitation finding operated in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>