<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 966 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798940</link>
    <description>EPCG concessional-duty benefit remained available where allegations of export-obligation non-fulfilment arose before expiry of the prescribed period, undisputed foreign-exchange earnings demonstrated compliance with the actual-user condition, and vehicle registration or insurance details did not establish breach of EPCG conditions. Registration of the imported vehicle as a tourist taxi did not, by itself, defeat the benefit. Delayed production of the EODC/redemption letter did not establish non-compliance where the DGFT issued it after timely applications and supporting documents had been submitted. Denial of the concession, consequential duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalties were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 966 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798940</link>
      <description>EPCG concessional-duty benefit remained available where allegations of export-obligation non-fulfilment arose before expiry of the prescribed period, undisputed foreign-exchange earnings demonstrated compliance with the actual-user condition, and vehicle registration or insurance details did not establish breach of EPCG conditions. Registration of the imported vehicle as a tourist taxi did not, by itself, defeat the benefit. Delayed production of the EODC/redemption letter did not establish non-compliance where the DGFT issued it after timely applications and supporting documents had been submitted. Denial of the concession, consequential duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalties were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>