<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 985 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798959</link>
    <description>Section 153C permits proceedings against an &quot;other person&quot; where a search warrant is issued in another person&#039;s name but executed at that person&#039;s premises; the panchanama cannot change the identity of the searched person. For completed, unabated assessment years, additions require incriminating material discovered in the search that relates specifically to each relevant year; material for one year and uncorroborated search admissions cannot justify additions for earlier years. In estimating liquor-business income, a declared net-profit rate of about 5.5% was considered reasonable where gross profit was verified, ordinary operating expenses were commercially plausible, and separate disallowance of expenses already excluded in computing profit would cause double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=923014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 985 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798959</link>
      <description>Section 153C permits proceedings against an &quot;other person&quot; where a search warrant is issued in another person&#039;s name but executed at that person&#039;s premises; the panchanama cannot change the identity of the searched person. For completed, unabated assessment years, additions require incriminating material discovered in the search that relates specifically to each relevant year; material for one year and uncorroborated search admissions cannot justify additions for earlier years. In estimating liquor-business income, a declared net-profit rate of about 5.5% was considered reasonable where gross profit was verified, ordinary operating expenses were commercially plausible, and separate disallowance of expenses already excluded in computing profit would cause double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>