<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798984</link>
    <description>Breach of principles of natural justice formed the primary challenge to the tax-demand order, with the petitioner asserting that substantial recovery had already been made. Subject to verification and confirmation of the prior recovery, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration after providing a reasonable opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798984</link>
      <description>Breach of principles of natural justice formed the primary challenge to the tax-demand order, with the petitioner asserting that substantial recovery had already been made. Subject to verification and confirmation of the prior recovery, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration after providing a reasonable opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>