<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1013 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798987</link>
    <description>Personal hearing under Section 75(4) requires effective advance intimation of hearing dates through the common portal. Where the last three hearing dates are not communicated and that omission is undisputed, the mandatory hearing requirement is not met. The resulting breach requires fresh adjudication after adequate advance notice, preserving the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1013 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798987</link>
      <description>Personal hearing under Section 75(4) requires effective advance intimation of hearing dates through the common portal. Where the last three hearing dates are not communicated and that omission is undisputed, the mandatory hearing requirement is not met. The resulting breach requires fresh adjudication after adequate advance notice, preserving the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>