<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1017 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798991</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined where a GST demand could be challenged through an available statutory appeal that had not been invoked. The petition was filed more than a year after the demand order, and neither the merits of the demand nor the alleged breach of natural justice was adjudicated. The petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1017 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798991</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined where a GST demand could be challenged through an available statutory appeal that had not been invoked. The petition was filed more than a year after the demand order, and neither the merits of the demand nor the alleged breach of natural justice was adjudicated. The petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>