<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1018 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798992</link>
    <description>Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-appearance was addressed where the petitioner&#039;s auditor or tax consultant could not attend notified hearings. The stated inability to attend was treated as sufficient grounds to reopen the appellate proceedings, while protecting procedural discipline through costs and a direction to appear before the appellate authority. The dismissal order was set aside, the appeal was restored for adjudication on merits subject to payment of costs, and the merits remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1018 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798992</link>
      <description>Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-appearance was addressed where the petitioner&#039;s auditor or tax consultant could not attend notified hearings. The stated inability to attend was treated as sufficient grounds to reopen the appellate proceedings, while protecting procedural discipline through costs and a direction to appear before the appellate authority. The dismissal order was set aside, the appeal was restored for adjudication on merits subject to payment of costs, and the merits remained open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>