<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate capacity limits virtual digital asset investments when ancillary objects lack corresponding main-object authority for listing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103750</link>
    <description>Corporate capacity under the memorandum of association did not extend to investment of preferential-issue proceeds in virtual digital assets merely because the activity had been added to the ancillary objects clause. Schedule I distinguishes a company&#039;s stated objects from matters necessary for furtherance of those objects; the first amendment addressed only the latter, while a later amendment added virtual digital asset business to the main objects clause. Until that main-objects amendment, fund raising and investment for that business were ultra vires. The listing application therefore could not be considered on the first amendment alone, and its return was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate capacity limits virtual digital asset investments when ancillary objects lack corresponding main-object authority for listing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103750</link>
      <description>Corporate capacity under the memorandum of association did not extend to investment of preferential-issue proceeds in virtual digital assets merely because the activity had been added to the ancillary objects clause. Schedule I distinguishes a company&#039;s stated objects from matters necessary for furtherance of those objects; the first amendment addressed only the latter, while a later amendment added virtual digital asset business to the main objects clause. Until that main-objects amendment, fund raising and investment for that business were ultra vires. The listing application therefore could not be considered on the first amendment alone, and its return was upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:31:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>