<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1916 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471693</link>
    <description>Enhanced penalty for under-reporting arising from misreporting requires clear identification of the specific statutory instance of misreporting under Section 270A(9). Where the penalty order neither specifies nor makes unambiguously discernible the applicable clause of Section 270A(9), the basis for characterising under-reported income as misreported income fails. The penalty levied at the enhanced misreporting rate was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 19:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1916 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471693</link>
      <description>Enhanced penalty for under-reporting arising from misreporting requires clear identification of the specific statutory instance of misreporting under Section 270A(9). Where the penalty order neither specifies nor makes unambiguously discernible the applicable clause of Section 270A(9), the basis for characterising under-reported income as misreported income fails. The penalty levied at the enhanced misreporting rate was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>