https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53814 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore due to a delay of 163 days in filing the appeal, with the appellant failing to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's attempt to shift blame onto a former employee, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility for timely filing. Despite the appellant's request for restoration of the appeal by recalling the Final Order, citing various reasons, the Tribunal found no valid grounds to condone the delay and upheld the dismissal of the appeal, highlighting the importance of timely compliance and genuine justifications for delays in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:53:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53814 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore due to a delay of 163 days in filing the appeal, with the appellant failing to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's attempt to shift blame onto a former employee, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility for timely filing. Despite the appellant's request for restoration of the appeal by recalling the Final Order, citing various reasons, the Tribunal found no valid grounds to condone the delay and upheld the dismissal of the appeal, highlighting the importance of timely compliance and genuine justifications for delays in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53814