<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 181 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53810</link>
    <description>Duty on waste and scrap of capital goods under Rule 57S(2)(c) arises only where the scrap is shown to have resulted from capital goods on which Modvat credit was availed. The record contained no material establishing that factual nexus, and in a demand proceeding the burden remained on the Revenue to prove excisability and dutiability. On that basis, the duty demand and penalty on the disputed scrap were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 181 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53810</link>
      <description>Duty on waste and scrap of capital goods under Rule 57S(2)(c) arises only where the scrap is shown to have resulted from capital goods on which Modvat credit was availed. The record contained no material establishing that factual nexus, and in a demand proceeding the burden remained on the Revenue to prove excisability and dutiability. On that basis, the duty demand and penalty on the disputed scrap were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>