https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798862 Statutory remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act was made available despite expiry of the ordinary limitation period where the auction purchaser had diligently pursued a writ challenge after refusal of refund. The Tribunal must consider on merits whether non-disclosure of a subsisting attachment in an auction sale breached the requirement to disclose material facts concerning the property's nature and value. The application may be filed within the prescribed three-week period and must be accepted without a separate application for condonation of delay. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:32:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798862 Statutory remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act was made available despite expiry of the ordinary limitation period where the auction purchaser had diligently pursued a writ challenge after refusal of refund. The Tribunal must consider on merits whether non-disclosure of a subsisting attachment in an auction sale breached the requirement to disclose material facts concerning the property's nature and value. The application may be filed within the prescribed three-week period and must be accepted without a separate application for condonation of delay. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798862