https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53803 The Tribunal upheld the service of an order through affixing on factory premises, rejecting the appellant's appeal as barred by limitation. Despite the appellant's challenge on the authenticity of the service method, the witness's testimony confirming the affixing of papers supported the Commissioner's decision. Relying on a previous Tribunal decision, the appellant's argument for proper service methods was countered by the Revenue's stance that affixing sufficed. The Tribunal emphasized the witness's presence during affixing as crucial, ultimately concluding that the service was valid, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on the confirmed service method. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:38:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53803 The Tribunal upheld the service of an order through affixing on factory premises, rejecting the appellant's appeal as barred by limitation. Despite the appellant's challenge on the authenticity of the service method, the witness's testimony confirming the affixing of papers supported the Commissioner's decision. Relying on a previous Tribunal decision, the appellant's argument for proper service methods was countered by the Revenue's stance that affixing sufficed. The Tribunal emphasized the witness's presence during affixing as crucial, ultimately concluding that the service was valid, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on the confirmed service method. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53803