<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 183 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53802</link>
    <description>Acid resistant clay bricks were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 6901, sub-heading 6901.10, because their nature, composition, manufacturing process, laboratory reports and end-use showed them to be clay bricks rather than fire clay bricks under Chapter Heading 6902, sub-heading 6902.90. The comparative chapter scheme and HSN notes supported that classification. An earlier mistaken classification did not create estoppel or res judicata against claiming the correct tariff entry, because tariff classification must follow the true nature of the goods. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 183 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53802</link>
      <description>Acid resistant clay bricks were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 6901, sub-heading 6901.10, because their nature, composition, manufacturing process, laboratory reports and end-use showed them to be clay bricks rather than fire clay bricks under Chapter Heading 6902, sub-heading 6902.90. The comparative chapter scheme and HSN notes supported that classification. An earlier mistaken classification did not create estoppel or res judicata against claiming the correct tariff entry, because tariff classification must follow the true nature of the goods. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>