<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 942 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798916</link>
    <description>Supplier certificates supporting receipt of supplies and GST payment provide prima facie support against a disputed GST demand, but must accurately identify the recipient&#039;s GSTIN where the supplier&#039;s GSTR-1 contains an erroneous recipient entry. A corrected certificate including the omitted GSTIN particulars was required for fresh adjudication. The disputed tax order was set aside and remanded for reconsideration, subject to the stipulated deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 942 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798916</link>
      <description>Supplier certificates supporting receipt of supplies and GST payment provide prima facie support against a disputed GST demand, but must accurately identify the recipient&#039;s GSTIN where the supplier&#039;s GSTR-1 contains an erroneous recipient entry. A corrected certificate including the omitted GSTIN particulars was required for fresh adjudication. The disputed tax order was set aside and remanded for reconsideration, subject to the stipulated deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>