<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 943 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798917</link>
    <description>Section 74(9) GST notices invoking fraud, wilful misrepresentation or suppression must disclose the foundational facts supporting those allegations. Mere mechanical use of those expressions, without reasons demonstrating application of mind, does not validly invoke the extended recovery mechanism. Notices that omit sufficient reasons and the factual basis for the alleged conduct are invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 943 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798917</link>
      <description>Section 74(9) GST notices invoking fraud, wilful misrepresentation or suppression must disclose the foundational facts supporting those allegations. Mere mechanical use of those expressions, without reasons demonstrating application of mind, does not validly invoke the extended recovery mechanism. Notices that omit sufficient reasons and the factual basis for the alleged conduct are invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>