<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input tax credit conditions require supplier tax payment, while fraud allegations and adjudication merits proceed through statutory appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103740</link>
    <description>Input tax credit is a conditional statutory entitlement requiring cumulative compliance, including actual tax payment by the supplier. Recipient exposure to supplier default is addressed through reversal and subsequent re-availment of credit, with the claimant bearing the burden of proving eligibility. Fraud-based proceedings require prima facie material supporting allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; detailed allegations of fake invoices, bogus supplies and no movement of goods require merits examination. Pre-notice intimation is enabling rather than mandatory, and investigation and adjudication by the proper officer do not alone establish bias. Merits disputes should ordinarily proceed through the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:32:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input tax credit conditions require supplier tax payment, while fraud allegations and adjudication merits proceed through statutory appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103740</link>
      <description>Input tax credit is a conditional statutory entitlement requiring cumulative compliance, including actual tax payment by the supplier. Recipient exposure to supplier default is addressed through reversal and subsequent re-availment of credit, with the claimant bearing the burden of proving eligibility. Fraud-based proceedings require prima facie material supporting allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; detailed allegations of fake invoices, bogus supplies and no movement of goods require merits examination. Pre-notice intimation is enabling rather than mandatory, and investigation and adjudication by the proper officer do not alone establish bias. Merits disputes should ordinarily proceed through the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:32:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>